Chapter VI. CONCLUSIONS As Moreau de Saint-Måry remarks: San Domingo was the first place in America
where African slaves were introduced. It was proposed to use them in place of
the Indians who were dying off in consequence of the hard work in the mines
to which they were ill-adapted.[1] At that period, there were two sets of Negro tribes, one group back of the
Gold Coast, the other further to the east across the Volta River, both in the
formative stage and as yet unknown to the white man. These two groups, to be
known later as the Ashanti and the Dahomans, were in time to become not only
rivals for the supremacy of West Africa, but were destined to establish in the
West Indies two distinct spheres of influence, as antagonistic in slave circles
as their own political ambitions were to be at home.[2] Among the Ashanti tribes, there was a strong religious organization with well
defined ritual, inspiring a coordination and spirit of nationalism that later
drew from Lord Wolseley the encomium: "From the Ashantis I learned one important
lesson, namely that any virile race can become paramount in its own region of
the world, if it possesses the courage, the constancy of purpose, and the self-sacrifice
to resolve that it will live under a stern system [1. Moreau de Saint-Måry, Description de la Partie Française de
Saint Dominigue, Vol. I, p. 24. 2. Note:--Commander Frederick E. Forbes, Dahomey and the Dahomans, London,
1851, Vol. II, p. 7 f., writes: "On the western and north-western side the stream
of the Volta alone separates Dahomey from its great rival monarchy of Western
Africa, the kingdom of Ashantee. Time alone can develop the consequences to
Africa of such powerful and ambitious nations being divided by no more difficult
boundary than the far from wide or impassable waters of the Volta. Already on
that side the Attahpahms and Ahjabee have been defeated although not annexed
to the rapidly increasing territory of Dahomey. If we turn to the East, we find
the extensive provinces of Yoruhbah looked upon with cupidity, and marked out
for devastation, slaver, and murder."] {p. 210} of Spartan military discipline enforced by one lord, master or king." 3 It was as a matter of fact, the exalted religious spirit that principally gave
to the various tribal units the cohesive power that formed the Ashanti into
a warlike people, and tended to crush down the antagonistic magic of the Obayifo. Meanwhile at Sabee, the capital of the Kingdom of Whydah on the Slave Coast,
well established Ophiolatry was extending its sway as a religious force of such
proportions that the Dahomans themselves fell under its influence when once
they had extended their domain to the sea through the conquest of Whydah. It is clear, then, that in its inception, Voodoo, as the West Indian offshoot
of the Ophiolatry of Sabee, must be considered technically as a form of religion.
The serpent worship of its African prototype was ultimately addressed to the
Supreme Being through the ancestral spirits supposedly indwelling in the sacred
serpents. The same conditions undoubtedly marked the Haitian Voodoo when it
was first established in its new field, but its ritual quickly suffered modifications
through contacts with the other religious influences derived from every part
of the dark continent through the influx of the heterogeneous masses of slaves
that found their way to West Indian bondage. Shortly before the outbreak of the Haitian Revolution, an offshoot of Voodoo
developed into the more sanguinary Don Pådro rites, but Voodoo itself continued
for a time, substantially unchanged. It was a secret religious function with
its own peculiar dance unaccompanied by drums or other instruments. Gradually it was found desirable to cloak the real Voodoo rites by holding
in advance a public dance which was summoned and accompanied by the loud beating
of the drums, presumably as an official excuse for the local authorities who
secretly sanctioned all that was going on. This dance in turn developed into
what came to be known as a Voodoo feast, since prolonged dancing without refreshments
is scarcely compatible with the Negro temperament. [3. H. Osman Newland, West Africa, London, 1922, p. 94.] {p. 211} Meanwhile the religious element in Voodoo became somewhat decadent and superstitious
practices associated themselves with its ceremonies at times. The Voodoo feast,
in consequence, was more and more accentuated. It was developing into a social
function, and amusement rather than worship frequently became the real objective. Today it is difficult to believe, that, except in rare cases, do we find Voodoo
in Haiti, strictly speaking, an act of worship. At least in the public estimation
almost everything is classified as Voodoo and the very drums that were originally
debarred from Voodoo by necessity if not by choice have actually come to be
known by the name of Voodoo drums. Magic and even witchcraft have entered into
an unholy alliance with Voodoo and the Papaloi and Mamaloi have somewhat assumed
the rôle of medium if not that of witch and necromancer. We are even told that the serpent has now been eliminated from the ritual.
This may be true. We would not like to question the reliability of such an authority
as Dr. Price-Mars in the matter. However, if so, the change must have been effected
within the past few years, as I know from reliable witnesses that the practice
was still in vogue well after the opening of the present century. In any case
it seems inconsistent to have our friend Dr. Price-Mars insisting on this disappearance
of the serpent from present-day Voodoo, and yet demanding that it still be classified
as a religion. Let us quote his very words: "It is inconceivable that the Dahoman
traditions should disappear without leaving traces in the Haitian beliefs. There
remain as survival a few touches. We remark that the fear noticed among our
peasants of killing adders (a species of water boa, ungalia) is the most
pronounced manifestation of this survival. If, therefore, we omit the cult of
the adder on which rests the whole economy of colonial Voodoo, probably because
it approaches more closely to its Dahoman connection, what remains then of the
original belief? Nothing except the dance and ecstasy, both strengthened by
sacrifices. May we not be permitted to point out that these three elements:
the dance, the ecstasy and the sacrifice, formed or form the permanent parts {p. 212} of religious rites and that one finds them connected or separated in the most
exalted religions."[4] But if you eliminate the serpent from the cult, it should
no longer be called Voodoo. Can you play Hamlet without the title part? It should
at least be known by some other term, more generic and including all Negro cults,
as did fetishism a generation ago. We can admit that much of the emotional religious
manifestations of the Haitians today is not Voodoo in the strict sense of the
word, but with all due respect to Dr. Price-Mars, we are not entirely convinced
that the serpent cult, substantially the same as practiced in the last century
is not still secretly in vogue in Haiti. The transition seems too sudden. Possibly,
too, there is just a little verbal quibble in the repeated assertions that the
serpent is no longer worshipped. Our contention, too, is that it was never worshipped.
It was merely venerated as a depository of some spiritual entity, not even itself
divine, but only an intermediary to the Divine Being, who is ultimately and
alone worshipped.[5] Arthur C. Millapaugh who was the Financial Adviser-General Receiver of Haiti,
1927-1929, in depicting the condition of Haiti, in the eve of intervention in
1915, simply states: "In the interior the practice of Voodooism persisted but
it was neither general nor open and tended to disappear."[6] But while he fails
to define what he means by Voodooism, since his references are to Kilsey, St.
John and Seabrook, we must conclude that he is taking it in its worst possible
sense. Certainly the wholesale confiscation of "Voodoo" drums by the [4. Dr. Price-Mars, Ainsi Parla l'Oncle, p. 120. 5. Note:--Dr. Price-Mars, however, goes too far when, in a lecture delivered
before the Society of History and Geography in 1926, he allows his fervour and
patriotism to carry him away and in an oratorical outburst asserts that Voodoo
which he defines as an animistic religion is not "opposed to the religion of
the one God, sovereign and supreme master of the Universe. "--Cfr. Une Étape
de l'Évolution Haïtienne, p. 115. He states specifically, p. 130:
"This animism which deifies the forces of Nature renders homage to the spiritual
genii which they incarnate, this animism, in fact, which renders to deceased
ancestors a cult of veneration and implores their favour and protection, is
it a religion in opposition to the religion of the one God, sovereign and supreme
Master of the Universe? No, certainly not." It is monotheistic, yes, and in
that restricted sense his statement might stand, and possibly that is all that
he really meant to signify. 6. Arthur C. Millapaugh, Haiti, under American Control 1915-1930, Boston,
1931, p. 20.] {p. 213} American Marines shows that the popular form of Voodoo was still very much
in evidence. As regards the conditions at the time of writing in 1931, Millapaugh
has nothing to say about Voodoo beyond a passing remark in a footnote wherein
he ascribes to the Medical Service the principal factors in the combating of
ages of superstition and voodooistic beliefs.[7] Possibly the fact that he is
writing for the World Peace Foundation makes him avoid whatever might offend
the self-respect of the Haitians to the detriment of general peace and harmony. Concerning human sacrifice, "the goat without horns" and cannibalism, despite
the loud protests of the friends of Haiti, it is hard to believe that the practice
is entirely extinct. It would, of course, be a grave mistake to suppose that
it is a regular practice or connived at by the present government authorities.
Still it would be even more surprising if the sexual excitement of their various
dances with the concomitant excessive use of stimulants, did not at times break
down the nervous systems of individuals here and there, and induce a kind of
paranoia with a recrudescence of all that is vilest and most degraded in fallen
nature. At all events, when such half-crazed outbreaks do occur, they are to be associated
with the Don Pådro swinish rites where the ordinary victim is the pig,
and where the human substitute would be more appropriately called not the "goat
without horns" but the "long pig" as was done under similar circumstances in
the distant islands of the Pacific. As regards Obeah, we find at work a process directly opposite to that noticed
in the case of Voodoo. Obeah, no less than Myalism, as we have seen, derive their origin from the
Ashanti. The latter was the old religious dance modified somewhat by circumstances
and surroundings in Jamaica, but substantially the same as practiced in West
Africa. The former, on the other hand was Ashanti witchcraft, essentially antagonistic
to Myalism which made one of its chief objects the "digging up" of Obeah. The Ashanti warlike and indomitable spirit was not crushed [7. Ditto, p. 140, Note 27.] {p. 214} by slavery, and the old religious practice easily stirred them up to a point
of rebellion. Hence from the earliest days of legislation in Jamaica, the tribal
religious dance remained inactive as assemblies were strictly prohibited. During the long years of slavery, then, Myalism might be regarded as dormant.
There was no opportunity of its development or branching out. It was preserved
secretly and cherished as the fondest tradition of the past. No doubt the hours
of amusement allowed to the slaves on their own cultivations, preserved in some
degree the Myalistic rites, disguised as one of the social dances that were
countenanced by the planters. The native African is essentially religious in his own way and as formal ceremonies
were debarred he found an outlet by associating with Obeah an element of worship,
if not of Accompong, at least of Sasabonsam or Obboney. If he could not venerate
the Supreme Being through the minor deities and ancestral spirits, he might
at least placate the evil one, and bespeak his influence for purpose of revenge
or to coerce his master to grant him something that he sought. We find Obeah thus really becoming a form of devil worship in the Christian
sense, and when at length Myalism entered into an alliance with it for the overthrow
of the white regime it naturally gained in the popular estimation of the slaves,
since its archenemy Myalism had come to recognize its power. And yet this public
esteem was not one of devotion but of unholy fear, which the Obeah man naturally
played up to his own advantage. With Emancipation, Myalism made haste to assert itself in an endeavour to regain
its pristine ascendancy and made open war on Obeah, at the expense be it said
of the general peace of the community. Its new-found independence led to excesses
of every kind and in course of years it became as great an evil as Obeah itself.
Its old priestly class was dead, for a generation none had come from Africa,
and there had been no opportunity of establishing a succession in the craft
or of passing along the ritual in practice. The traditions and nothing more
could have remained, and it is questionable whether the new leaders had any
legitimate claim to {p. 215} the exercise of the rôle that they assumed. It is simple, then, to see
that the decay of Myalism as a religious force was inevitable. And it would
certainly soon have been entirely eliminated had not its spirit and much of
its traditional ritual found new scope in the kindred spirit of the emotional
Revivalism of the Methodists and even more so among the so-called native Baptist
congregations. But perhaps it is more conspicuous of all among the Bedwardites,
so characterized by the peculiar hip-movement that is clearly African, and which
shows itself not only in their dance but also in their religious processions,
and gives a peculiar lilt to all their hymns. Here, strictly speaking, Myalism disappears as a separate entity, and its very
name is dying out except as a mysterious something that has endured in its opposition
to the Obeah man who more and more assumes the dual rôle of Myalist by
day and Obeah man by night, using the title as a safeguard from the law in the
prosecution of his real aims in life. As a further consequence, Obeah is taking
on more and more of a religious aspect and it is now, not entirely undeservedly,
classified by many as devil worship. My first experience with an Obeah man in Jamaica was as follows. Accompanied
by a native of the district I was returning late one night to my residence high
up in the mountains, when suddenly my companion who was leading the way shrank
back and pointing a trembling finger through an opening of the coffee walk where
we happened to be passing, whispered almost inaudibly: "Obi, Sah!" It was a bright moonlight night, and a short distance off the path might be
seen a filthy-looking bedraggled fellow plying his art of Obeah for weal or
woe. I drew my reluctant companion behind a shrub to watch the process which
is so seldom vouchsafed to the eye of a white man. The Obeah man had placed on the ground some sticks, feathers, eggshells and
other objects that could not clearly be distinguished. A piece of string was
placed on top of the little heap. He then retreated for a short distance and
began a mumbling incantation {p. 216} which was accompanied by a rhythmic swaying of the body. With hands behind
the back he next approached, crossing one leg over the other as he slowly advanced
and drew near the incongruous ingredients of what was evidently intended for
a fetish. With legs still stiffly crossed and swaying body he stooped and breathed
upon and spat at it, and then gathered up the articles one by one, still mumbling
some weird incantation as he placed the sticks together and crushed the eggshells
and other ingredients within them and finally bound all together with the piece
of string. When the task was accomplished a cringing woman advanced from the shadow of
a tree where her presence had not previously been noted. The Obeah man passed
her the fetish charm and with fierce injunction charged her to hasten on her
way without looking back or speaking to a living soul. She was especially warned
to guard her fetish from every moisture. Should river or rain or dew, or even
the perspiration of her own body chance to wet it, not only would all efficacy
be lost but it would inevitably turn against herself. I could not follow all
the words despite my knowledge of the language of the "bush," but I had been
able to gather the general gist of the instructions which were almost in the
form of an invocation or curse.[8] Strictly speaking what I had been watching was not really the practice of Obeah
but rather the making of a protective fetish or good luck charm, our friend
was working in the rôle of Myal man and cared nothing if he was observed.
Had he been really making Obi he would have been surer of his privacy and would
have squatted on the ground surrounded by his paraphernalia and this would have
been the scene with little variation: Most of the ingredients to be used are concealed in a bag from which he draws
them as he needs them. The special offering of his patron which must include
a white fowl, two bottles of rum, and a silver offering are on the ground beside
him. Before him is the inevitable empty bottle to receive the ingredients. The
incantation opens with a prolonged mumbling which is supposed to be "an unknown
tongue." This is accompanied by a swaying of the body. [8. Note:--Compare this scene with that described by Rattray on page 127.] {p. 217} Gradually ingredients are placed in the bottle, and a little rum is
poured over them. The throat of the fowl is deftly slit and drops of blood are
allowed to fall first on the silver offering, and then on the contents of the
bottle to which is finally added a few feathers plucked from various parts of
the fowl with a last libation of rum. During all this process the Obeah man
has been drawing inspiration from frequent draughts of rum, reserving a substantial
portion to be consumed later when he makes a meal off the flesh of the fowl. When the bottle concoction has been completed and the last incantation has
been said over it, the Obeah man entrusts it to his patron with minute instructions
how it is to be buried on some path where the intended victim is sure to pass
or as near his dwelling as possible. In the days of slavery, the expert in Obeah was frequently distinguished by
being physically or mentally defective or abnormal. So we find today that not
a few of the pretenders to expertness in Obeah affect a disregard for cleanliness
and hygiene, at strange variance with the Jamaican's characteristic love of
bathing and neatness. If not actually disfigured, then, the Obeah man usually
presents a disgusting and filthy appearance especially when actually making
Obi. Again, he cannot as a rule meet your gaze, but shiftily moves his eyes
around and nervously distorts his countenance, although on the other hand he
will stare fixedly at the blazing tropical sun without blinking an eye. Possibly
his very hang-dog look may be explained by injury to the optic nerve induced
during his long preparation for his future avocation when as a little fellow
he was forced to stand motionless by the hour with every muscle tense and set
while he stared the sun out of countenance. Another peculiarity of Jamaica Obeah should be noted here. Possibly through
contact with missionaries at an early date in West Africa, Obeah in its various
manifestations makes use of crosses to a great extent. In the making of a fetish,
as we have seen, the Obeah man approaches his task, carefully crossing his legs
at every step. So, too, while crouched over the bottle, in making {p. 218} real Obi, he is particular to keep his legs crossed under him. Many crosses
are made during the ritual and sticks are crossed and re-crossed again and again.
It is no uncommon thing to find a sickly child to whom the Obeah man has been
called all marked up with crosses made with indigo or coloured clay. For "big
obi" the wax drippings from altar candles and the refuse from the censer after
benediction but especially the grains of unburnt incense, are particularly in
demand. This last is probably explained by what follows. The Obeah man has a wholesome fear of the priest and usually tries to avoid
his presence. There is a conviction among them that the priest can exercise
a more powerful influence than any Obeah man. This belief is expressed by the
aphorism: "French obi, him strongest." The first priest to become well known
through the Jamaica "bush" was a Frenchman, and the Catholic Church in consequence
has come to be known familiarly as the French Church. Hence "French obi, him
strongest" really means that the Catholic Church exercises the strongest Obeah.
It is also accepted as a fact by the devotees of the Obeah cult that the priest
can give evidence of this dominant power by "lighting a candle on them." This
process is thus described: "Fadder take pin and Fadder take candle; and him
stick der pin in der candle; and him light der candle on you. Der candle him
burn, and him burn, and him burn. And you waste, and you waste, and you waste.
And when der flame touch dat pin--you die." So that it is only necessary for
a priest to make the playful remark to some black fellow in the "bush," "I think
I'll have to light a candle on you," to bring him to his knees with: "O Fadder,
don't." The Ashanti Mmoatia, or little folks, are associated with the forest monster
Sasabonsam and the Obayifo or witch in imparting power to the suman or fetish.[9]
According to A. W. Cardinall they are "Preeminently mischief-workers, and are
said to 'throw stones at one as one passes through the bush.'"[10] Captain Rattray
calls them "fairies," and also tells us that in the Ashanti belief they are
"Of three distinct varieties: black, red and white, and [9. Note:--Cfr. Rattray, Religion and Art in Ashanti, p. 23. 10. Cardinall, In Ashanti and Beyond, p. 224.] {p. 219} they converse by means of whistling. The black fairies are more or less innocuous,
but the white and the red mmoatia are up to all kinds of mischief."[11] For
this latter group perhaps imps would be a more appropriate name than fairies.
Be that as it may, the Jamaica duppies or ghosts are notorious for their stone-throwing
propensities, and this poltergeist, as it is technically called, is associated
in the popular mind with evil agencies. In this connection it is interesting to note the testimony of no less an authority
than Lord Olivier, a former Governor of Jamaica, who recently wrote to me: "The
occasional outbursts of this 'poltergeist' phenomenon in Jamaica is remarkable.
I investigated with some care the evidence as to one case which occurred when
I was in Jamaica and there have been very full reports in the local Press of
another recent occurrence which seems to have been carefully investigated without
detecting any possibility of corporeal agency." The phenomenon itself is ascribed by the peasantry to duppies or ghosts who
despite their intangible nature are extraordinarily good shots to all appearances.
True, it is a frequent means of frightening or annoying an enemy to cast stones
from a distance so that they will fall on the roof of his house and make him
think that the duppies are after him. On the other hand there are undeniable
instances of persons being stoned and that, too, by no determinable agency.
The stones for example, simply came out of the trees with truly remarkable accuracy
and no one can be found either in the trees or on the line of fire. A Jamaica missionary already quoted on Myalism and Obeah, graphically describes
some of his own experiences and gives many instances that he has investigated
where the stones thus thrown seem to violate all the laws of science. For example,
"Some of the stones which came from the bushy declivity, after smashing through
a window, turned at a right angle and broke the teacher's clock, glasses, etc.,
on a side-board."[12] A man running from the stone-thrower turns and fires a
gun in the direction from which [11. Rattray, 1. c., p. 25 f. 12. A. J. Emerick, Jamaica Duppies, Woodstock, 1916, p. 342.] {p. 220} the stones were coming, and as he does so another stone comes from the very
opposite direction and hits him in the back of the neck.[13] "Some of them seem
to come in the open door, turn around and fall at the teacher's feet."[14] A
stone that has come flying into the house is marked by one of the occupants
and thrown out again with the remark, "If him be a true duppy, him will throw
this stone back," and back it came, "proving that the stone-thrower was a true
duppy," in the common estimation.[15] At times these duppies, imps, evil spirits, call them what you will, have other
means of disturbing one's peace of mind. On one occasion I was on the outskirts of a notorious Obeah district when a
man, a non-Catholic, came to me and begged me to come and bless his house as
his children were starving. "Why don't you give them something to eat?" was
the obvious question. "Dem can't eat, Fadder," was the astonishing reply. "Someone
put Obi on dem." He explained further that when they tried to eat, the food
would fly up and hit them in the face, but that they could not get it into the
mouth. Absolutely incredulous, I mounted my horse and followed him to his house.
The entire village was assembled around the dwelling and a state of panicky
hysteria had taken possession of all. While I did not actually witness the diabolic
display myself, as I did not feel justified in provoking the evil one to an
exhibition merely to satisfy my curiosity, all the men, women and children there
present agreed in their testimony of what had happened. I blessed the house,
but whether the blessing took or not, I cannot say, as I was shortly leaving
Jamaica and never revisited the district. To understand the rapid transition from Myalism to Revivalism in Jamaica, it
is necessary to go into the question of the religious condition of the island
in the closing days of slavery. In his chapter on "Religion and Education" prior to 1782, Gardner writes: "It
is no easy task to portray the religious history of the colony during the period
now under review. With the [13. Ditto, p. 342 14. Ditto, p. 343. 15. Ditto, p. 343.] {p. 221} exception of some letters written by the rector of Port Royal, immediately
after the earthquake (preserved in GENTLEMAN'S MAGAZINE) there appears to be
no document in existence which in any way illustrates the spiritual labours
of the clergy. From Mr. Bridges, as a clergyman, we might have expected some
account of the labours of his brethren; but though he devotes considerable space
to the history of the established church, it is only so far as the emoluments
and status of its clergy were concerned. "Amidst the dearth of information, the letters of the Port Royal rector are
of peculiar interest. Writing of the day of the earthquake, he says, 'On Wednesday,
the 7th, I had been at prayers, which I did every day since I was rector of
Port Royal, to keep up some show of religion amongst a most ungodly and debauched
people.' This description of the general character of the population applies,
it is to be feared, to the whole island, but it is questionable whether the
incumbent of the doomed city was not almost singular in his zeal."[16] Then after quoting further from the letter, Gardner adds: "For more than two
generations we shall search in vain among the records of the colony for any
further illustration of ministerial zeal and fidelity."[17] Edward Long states: "The bishop of London claims this as a part of his diocese;
but his jurisdiction is renounced and barred by the laws of the island, in every
sense, except so far as relates or appertains to ecclesiastical regimen of the
clergy; which imparts no higher power than that of granting orders, and giving
pastoral admonitions."[18] On the following page he asserts: "The governor as
supreme head of the provincial church, and in virtue of the royal instruments,
is vested with a power of suspending a clergyman here, of lewd or disorderly
life, ab officio, upon the petition of his parishioners; and I can remember
one example of this sort. The governor inducts into the several rectories within
the island and its dependencies, etc."[19] This power of patronage on [16. Gardner, History of Jamaica, p. 192. 17. Ditto, p. 193. 18. Long, History of Jamaica, Vol. II, p. 235. 19. Ditto, p. 236.] {p. 222} the part of the governor naturally led to abuses as in the case of the Satirist
"Peter Pindar" who was the last person one would expect to find gracing the
pulpit of a church. And yet we read in Chambers's Cyclopedia of English Literature:
"Dr. John Wolcot (1738-1819) was a coarse but lively satirist, who under the
name of 'Peter Pindar,' published a variety of effusions on the topics and public
men of his times, which were eagerly read and widely circulated. Many of them
were in ridicule of the reigning sovereign, George III, who was a good subject
for the poet; though the latter, as he himself acknowledged, was a bad subject
to the king. . . . Wolcot was instructed in medicine, and 'walked the hospitals'
in London, after which he proceeded to Jamaica with Sir William Trelawney, governor
of the island, who had engaged him as his medical attendant. The social habits
of the doctor rendered him a favourite in Jamaica; but his time being only partly
employed by his professional avocations, he solicited and obtained from his
patron the gift of a living in the church, which happened to be vacant. The
bishop of London ordained the graceless neophyte and Wolcot entered upon his
sacred duties. His congregation consisted mostly of Negroes, and Sunday being
their principal holiday and market, the attendance at the church was very limited.
Sometimes not a single person came, and Wolcot and his clerk--the latter being
an excellent shot--used at such times, after waiting for ten minutes, to proceed
to the sea-side, to enjoy the sport of shooting ring-tailed pigeons! The death
of Sir William Trelawney cut off all further hopes of preferment, and every
inducement to a longer residence in the island. Bidding adieu to Jamaica and
the church, Wolcot accompanied Lady Trelawney to England, and established himself
as a physician at Truro, in Cornwall."[20] This prepares us for the startling testimony of Charles Leslie, written in
1840: "'Tis surprising that such worthless and abandoned men should be sent
to such a place as this. The clergy here are of a character so vile, that I
do not care to mention it; for except a few, they are generally the most finished
of our debauchees. [20. Chambers's Cyclopedia of English Literature, London, 1899, Vol.
II, p. 24.] {p. 223} Messrs. Galpin, Johnston and May, are indeed men whose unblemished lives dignify
the character they bear. They generally preach either in their own churches,
or to a few in some private houses every Sunday; but for others, their church
doors are seldom opened. "[21] With such an account of the clergy, it is not surprising to find Stephen Fuller,
the Agent for Jamaica at London, addressing the Earl of Shelburne as regards
the pressing military needs of the island, painting the free Negroes and mulattoes
in sombre colours. Thus he writes on April 2, 1782. "The free Negroes and mulattoes
have been reckoned about 900 fencible men, out of which number not above 500
can be employed to any useful purpose; the greatest part of them being the most
idle, debauched, distempered, profligate wretches upon earth. Besides this,
there is an insuperable objection to their being armed, as they are not to be
trusted in Corps composed of themselves, and the incorporating them with the
whites will not be endured."[22] What, then, the religious and moral condition
of the slaves themselves must have been, can well be surmised. William Wilberforce, writing in 1823, states: "It cannot be denied, I repeat,
that the slaves, more especially the great body of the field Negroes, are practically
strangers to the multiplied blessings of the Christian Revelation. What a consideration
this! A nation, which, besides the invaluable benefit of an unequalled degree
of true civil liberty, has been favoured with an unprecedented measure of religious
light, with its long train of attendant blessings, has been for two centuries
detaining in a state of slavery, beyond example rigorous, and in some particulars,
worse than Pagan darkness and depravity, hundreds of thousands of their fellow-creatures,
originally torn from their native land by fraud and violence. Generation after
generation have been pining away; and in this same condition of ignorance and
degradation they still, for the most part, remain."[23] [21. Leslie, New History of Jamaica, p. 303. 22. Cfr. Stephen Fuller, Original Letter Book, 1776-1784, Boston College
Library, MS. No. 6002. 23. Wilberforce, Appeal etc., p. 19.] {p. 224} It was Wilberforce's Appeal that drew an answer from the Reverend George
Wilson Bridges, Rector of the Parish of Manchester (1817-23) and later Rector
of the Parish of St. Anns (1823-37) of whom Frank Cundall says, that he "as
a rule displays more fertile imagination than Long without half his trustworthiness
as a historian."[24] Cundall further observes in his regard: "In 1823 he published
his Voice from Jamaica, written in defence of slave-owners, for which
the Assembly two years later voted him 700 pounds."[25] This fact in itself
renders Bridges' evidence of questionable value. As regards the particular citation which we have given from Wilberforce, Bridges
replies in part: "As to the 'pagan darkness' of the Negroes, though their progress
certainly does not keep pace with our anxious wishes to see them in that state
which would make it safe to confide ourselves to their estimation of a Christian
oath, nor in that condition which would render it advantageous to themselves
to be trusted with the liberty of self-control, yet the promises of Christianity
are so far understood, and its preliminary rites so ardently desired by them,
that during my residence in this parish, I have actually baptized 9,413 Negro
slaves, many of them attend church; some have learned the Lord's prayer, and
ten commandments, and a few have so far advanced, as to be now disseminating
their little stock of religious knowledge on the estates to which they are attached.
As I said before, I believe all my fellow-labourers here have been at least
as assiduous as myself, and some more successful. I expect therefore that you,
sitting by your own fireside, four thousand miles off, will not refuse credit
to the unanswerable fact, advanced by one who is on the spot, an actor in the
deeds he records, and who has certainly the better means of forming a correct
judgment, on the point at issue."[26] Here is a direct challenge, and it is taken up by a brother clergyman, also
long resident in Jamaica. Reverend William James Gardner, Congregational Minister,
who (11(2d in charge of [24. Cundall, Historic Jamaica, London, 1915, p. 5. 25. Ditto, p. 372. 26. Bridges, Voice from Jamaica, p.26 f.] {p. 225} the North Street Church, Kingston, in 1874, reviewing the whole question, takes
Mr. Bridges to task in no uncertain manner. Thus he writes: "The Rev. G. W.
Bridges, the annalist, stated in 1823, that he had baptized 9,413 slaves during
two years, and that many of them attended church. The proportion must indeed
have been small, for the church he refers to (Mandeville) could not at that
time have held a twentieth part of that number. Most of these slaves paid half-a-crown
each as a baptismal fee. Mr. Bridges, in happy oblivion of what he had said
of the money given to missionaries being the result of a cruel and heartless
imposition on their superstition and ignorance, observes of the fees received,
that 'this laudable desire of exchanging worldly goods for celestial rewards,'
evinces 'a measure of faith words cannot express.' By the end of another year
this zealous baptizer was able to report that 12,000 out of 17,000 slaves in
the parish had received the holy ordinance, and he adds 'happily there are no
sectarians,'"[27] This last remark probably explains the bitterness of Mr. Gardner
himself. However, the general estimate given is supported by the Reverend R.
Bicknell, a contemporary of Mr. Bridges and like him a Minister of the Established
Church, who was stationed at Kingston and Port Royal during the period that
Mr. Bridges was at Manchester. He says: "In the parish church of Clarendon I
have often been, and never saw a hundred of all colours there, latterly a much
less number, and once in particular, about ten or twelve only; though within
five or six miles of the church there were several thousands of inhabitants.
The churches of St. John's, St. Thomas's in the Vale, St. Dorothy's, St. George's,
St. Mary's, Hanover and Vere, are but little better attended, some of them even
worse, as I can testify from my own knowledge, and the assurance of creditable
persons; the remaining churches I believe to be but little better, with the
exceptions of those in the parishes of Kingston, St. Thomas in the East, St.
Catherine, Port Royal, and St. Andrew."[28] Certainly if Mr. [27. Gardner, History of Jamaica, p. 334. 28. R. Bicknell, The West Indies as they are; or a Real Picture of Slavery;
but more particularly as it exists in the island of Jamaica, London, 1825, p.
74.] 226 VOODOOS AND OBEAHS Bridges had been really accomplishing anything out of the ordinary some mention
of it would be expected here. The Reverend John Riland, Curate of Yoxall, Staffordshire, somewhat facetiously
styles Mr. Bridges' claims of 9,413 baptisms of slaves: "A direct illustration
of Obeah practice under the forms of Christianity." And adds: "If we assume
these 9,413 to have been also actually converted from Paganism to Christianity,
or even to have been taught enough of the fundamental truths of the Gospel to
understand the engagements into which they entered, we have here a miracle as
great as was exhibited on the Day of Pentecost. And if they were not converted
to Christianity, of if they did not understand the nature of the solemn vow
and covenant they were called to make, what a mockery of religion, and what
a prostitution of the sacred initiatory rite of baptism, is here made the subject
of boast."[29] But let us return to Mr. Bicknell whom we have recently quoted. We find him
advertised as: "A member of the University of Cambridge, late Naval Chaplain
at Port Royal, sometime Curate of that Parish, and previously of the City of
Kingston, in the aforesaid island." His description of conditions among the
slaves is not a pleasant one. Thus he declares: "It is not enough that most
of the slaves must work in their grounds a part of that Holy day, but to add
to the abomination, a market must be kept also on the Sunday, for the sale of
provisions, vegetables, fruit, &c. It is the only market-day, fellow-countrymen,
and fellow-Christians, which the poor Negroes and coloured slaves have, and
instead of worshipping their God, they are either cultivating their portions
of land to preserve life, or trudging like mules with heavy loads, five, ten,
or even twenty miles, to sell the little surplus of their provision grounds,
or to barter it for a little salt fish to season their poor meals: or what is
much worse, to spend, very often, the value in new destructive rum, which intoxicates
them, and drowns for a time, the reflection that they are despised and burdened
slaves. I shall never forget the horror and disgust which I felt on going on
shore, for the first time, in Kingston, in the [29. John Riland, Memoir of a West India Planter, London, 1827, p. 186
f.] {p. 227} month of August, 1819; it was on a Sunday, and I had to pass by the Negro Market,
where several thousands of human beings, of various nations and colours, but
principally Negroes, instead of worshipping their Maker on this Holy day, were
busily employed ill all kinds of traffic in the open streets."[30] Again he tells us: "I have resided nearly five years in Jamaica, and have preached
two or three sermons every Sunday; many other clergymen have also exerted themselves,
but to very little purpose, as far as slaves are concerned, as those horrid
and legalized scenes are just the same; for this Sunday market is a bait of
Satan, to draw away the ignorant Negro; his temporal and pressing natural wants
are set in opposition to his spiritual ones, and the former prevail to that
degree, that most of the churches ill the island are nearly empty."[31] He adds later: "I am aware that there is a law in Jamaica imposing a fine on
proprietors or overseers for compelling the Negroes to do certain kinds of labour
on the Sabbath; but it is notorious that this law is altogether a dead letter,
and that in respect to their grounds, the Negroes not only go of their own accord
to work there, as not having sufficient time allowed them otherwise; but if
they are found inattentive, it is a custom to send one of the bookkeepers, on
that Holy day, to see that all the slaves are at work, and to watch them a certain
time, that there may not be a want of food. For putting the mill about (viz.
for making sugar) on a Sunday, there is a fine of 50 pounds, one half of which,
I believe goes to the informer; but though this is done in defiance of law in
almost every, if not every parish in the island, I never heard of an information
being laid for that. offence, as those planters who do not put their mills about,
wink at it in others, and no clergyman or other religious person would venture,
I think, to inform, as he would be sure to meet with insult, or some worse injury,
for his conscientious interference."[32] Mr. Bicknell's conclusion is: "Nearly the whole of the field [30. Bicknell, l. c., Flyleaf. 31. Ditto, p. 67. 32. Ditto, p. 73.] {p. 228} Negroes (nine-tenths of the population) have not even the outward form of religion,
and are just as great heathens as they were on the banks of the Gambia or Niger."[33] The Reverend Peter Duncan, a Wesleyan-Methodist missionary, arrived in Jamaica
early in 1821 and laboured there for over eleven years. In reference to Dr.
Coke's visit to the island in 1789, he writes: "The island has been under British
government for upwards of a century, yet scarcely anything had been done for
the souls of the people. The habits of the whites had indeed become much more
settled. They were friendly and hospitable in their intercourse with each other,
and had improved in many of the external civilities of modern refinement, but
the hallowed restraints of religion were as much unknown as ever. They were
strangers to the enjoyments of the domestic circle, and throughout the whole
country the standard of morals was deplorably low. It is true, emigrants from
Great Britain were constantly arriving, but they left their profession of Christianity
behind, and were soon assimilated to the corrupt mass by whom they were preceded.
The ordinances of religion in many parts were rarely administered. There was
a famine of the bread of life. There was indeed a church in almost every parish,
but many of the benefices were generally vacant; and excepting on the occasion
of funerals, the churches in the country parishes were seldom open for divine
service, even upon the Lord's Day. Numbers of the clergy were living openly
in concubinage and were otherwise unblushingly immoral; and it may be fairly
questioned whether before 1789 that Sabbath ever dawned upon Jamaica, which
witnessed five hundred [33. Ditto, p. 71. Note:--The Home Government made futile efforts at times
to check the growing abuses, if we may judge from a letter of the Duke of Halifax
answering one from Stephen Fuller who had sought an extended leave of absence
for the Rev. John Venn, at that time Rector of St. Catherine's, Jamaica, and
dated April 17, 1764, wherein he states: "I shall be ready to move his Majesty
to grant him that indulgence, upon being assured that Governor Lyttleton is
satisfied of the necessity and approves of the curate who is to officiate in
his stead. For I must acquaint you that, upon the complaints which have been
made by the Bishop of London of the bad consequences arising from the general
and frequent absence of the clergy from their livings in the West Indies, I
have made it a rule never to procure any such indulgence, unless the application
be so granted."--Cfr. Stephen Fuller, Original Letter Book, 1762-1771,
Boston College Library, MS. No. 6001.] {p. 229} persons in all the places of worship put together out of a population of between
four and five hundred thousand souls."[34] The Reverend Claudius Buchanan while examining the "State of our Established
Church in the West Indies, in regard to its efficiency as an instrument of instructing
the people"[35] asserts: "In Jamaica there are twenty parishes. Supposing that
there are also twenty Rectors (in some islands there are many pluralists) we
shall then have twenty Clergymen in an island which is 150 miles long and 40
in a medium broad; which gives a district of 300 square miles for the labours
of each Clergyman. The population of the island is stated by Mr. Edwards to
amount to 30,000 whites, 10,000 free persons of colour and 210,894 slaves: which,
when divided among twenty Clergymen, will give to each a cure of 12,554 souls.
It will hardly be necessary to say more of the utter inadequacy of the public
means of religious instruction in Jamaica. This island is a favourable specimen
of the state of the Established Church in the old islands. "On the whole it may be safely affirmed, that no human zeal could be equal
to a tenth part of the duties of the parochial Clergy, were the slaves practically
regarded as belonging to their flock. But the truth is, that this unfortunate
mass of the population has, with very few exceptions, never been so regarded,
either by the Government or the Clergy."[36] The Reverend Peter Samuel reached Jamaica in January, 1832, where he was to
labour as a Methodist missionary for over eleven years. In his account of the
development of his denomination in the island, he stresses among the obstacles
encountered at the start: "The pernicious influence of Obeahism and African
superstitions"[37] and adds: "The immense influence possessed and exercised
by West Indian proprietors in the Parliament of the mother country, as well
as in the Colonial Assembly, gave a respectability, [31. Peter Duncan, A Narrative of the Wesleyan Mission to Jamaica, London,
1849 p. 7 f. 32. Claudius Buchanan, Colonial Ecclesiastical Establishment, London,
1812, p. 53. 33. Ditto, p. 60 f. 34. Peter Samuel, The Wesleyan-Methodist Missions in Jamaica and Honduras,
Delineated, London, 1850, p. 9.] {p. 230} a consistency, an air of justice, and a degree of power sufficiently formidable
to the apparently weak efforts of a few humble missionaries."[38] We have indicated here the foundation of the bitterest religious controversy
in the history of Jamaica. When Dr. Coke first visited the island in January
1789, he was deeply touched by the condition of religious abandonment that he
found amongst the slaves. He was not slow on his return to England to send out
the Reverend William Hammett in that same year to establish the Wesleyan Missionary
Society in Jamaica. The emotional element in Methodism immediately appealed to the kindred Myalistic
spirit among the Negroes, and as they found in the assemblies which the newly-arrived
missionaries were convoking in open defiance of the authorities and in face
of the opposition of the planters, an opportunity of renewing much of their
own Pagan rites in connection with the Christian service, they were not slow
to take advantage of the general confusion of ideas, and forthwith the "digging
up" of Obeah again became much in evidence. And the missionaries, good, well
meaning souls, derived comfort and consolation among their hardships and persecutions,
in what they must have regarded as promising manifestations of faith. They watched
with delight the zeal to stamp out this African superstition, which seemed to
them the Negro's real religion, and which they rightly interpreted as a form
of devil worship. And yet they were unconsciously fostering and abetting a movement
among the slaves that was for the most part as Pagan as the Obeah that they
were "digging up." Space will not permit our going into this controversy in detail. We can only
touch on it as far as it has reference to our present study. The nucleus of
the Wesleyan Mission in Jamaica was really formed of refugees from what is now
the United States in consequence of the Revolutionary War, at least as regards
the leading spirits. This in itself may have stirred up opposition.[39] On one
occasion, Dr. Coke himself, while preaching in Kingston, was al- [38. Ditto, p. 10. 39. Note:--Cfr. Duncan, Wesleyan Mission to Jamaica, p. 11.] {p. 231} most dragged from the hall by a party of whites who seriously threatened him
with bodily harm.[40] In November, 1790, the Grand jury of Kingston presented to the Court of Quarter-Sessions
a complaint against the Methodist Meeting in that city as a nuisance, on the
grounds that it is "injurious to the general peace and quiet of the inhabitants
of this town."[41] Buchanan tells us: "After the Methodist Missionaries had been about ten years
in the Island of Jamaica; and had built a chapel at Kingston, which was attended
by some whites, and by many people of colour and Negroes; the Colonial Legislature
passed an Act, on the 17th December, 1802, by which they prohibited, and made
penal, 'preaching or teaching in a meeting of Negroes, or people of colour,
by a person not duly qualified.' There had hitherto been no law in Jamaica for
Dissenters to qualify at all; and the Legislature thought fit to determine,
that a person regularly and legally qualified in England, under the Toleration
Act, was not duly qualified for Jamaica. In consequence of this law, two of
the Missionaries were thrown into prison. The penalty for first offence was
'one month's imprisonment, and hard labour in the common workhouse.' The penalty
for the second offence was, 'imprisonment and hard labour for six months,' or
such further punishment 'not extending to life, as the Court should see fit
to inflict.'--Such a law, in relation to a white man, had never been heard of
before in Jamaica; for the laws there are highly respectful to the privileged
order. If again, a black man should 'teach or preach in a meeting of Negroes,
not being duly qualified,' he was 'to be sentenced to receive, for the second
offence, a public flogging, not exceeding thirty-nine lashes.' "By the operation of this law, the places of worship of other denominations
of Christians besides the Methodists, were shut up. The preachers were silenced;
and among the rest, a regularly ordained minister of the Church of Scotland.
The missionaries, in the extremity of their sufferings, compared this legal
opposition, [40. Note:--Cfr. Duncan, l. c., p. 8 f. 41. Duncan, l. c., p. 16.] {p. 232} and its effects, to the persecution of Diocletian; only that the punishments
were not, as the law expressed it, 'to extend to life.' "The alleged ground for passing this Edict in Jamaica, whatever the truth of
the case might be, was certainly similar to that of the Edicts of Diocletian.
It was stated in the preamble: That the Slaves, by being permitted to assemble
at these meetings to hear Christian instruction, were in danger of being 'perverted
with fanatical notions; and that opportunity was afforded them of concerting
schemes of much public and private mischief.' "On an application made by the different religious societies in England whose
missionaries had been silenced, the Committee of the Privy Council for matters
of Trade, examined the merits of the new Act; and upon their Report, it was
disallowed by his Majesty, and consequently ceased to have any force in Jamaica."[42] While we cannot help admiring the energy and long-suffering manifested by the
Methodist missionaries in their misguided zeal with the slaves, as we read their
glowing reports of souls reclaimed, we must keep in mind the warning of Mr.
Gardner: "With the exception of one or two denominations, copious accounts have
been published by missionaries of the labours in which they have taken part
in Jamaica. It may be asserted, without any violation of Christian charity,
that the most glowing descriptions of the results which have followed such labours
are the least trustworthy. Honest, well-meaning men have frequently described
as fruit that which was only blossom; while vain, though pious men, too anxious
for the praise of their fellow-creatures, and ambitious of the ephemeral fame
of missionary chronicles or the applause of public meetings, have sometimes
injured the cause they wished to serve by too highly-coloured descriptions of
their success."[43] In a Report of the committee of the whole house which had been appointed "to
inquire into and take further into consideration the state of the island," presented
to the House of Assembly [42. Buchanan, Colonial Ecclesiastical Establishment, p. 76 ff. 43. Gardner, History of Jamaica, p. 340.] {p. 233} of Jamaica on Dec. 20, 1815, we find the words:[44] "The subject of religion,
and the best method of introducing genuine Christianity in the mild and beneficent
spirit of its founder, is of so great importance that the committee decline
going deeper into it at present; but recommend that early in the next session
a. committee may be appointed, for the special purpose of discussing and considering
the most eligible manner of diffusing religious information amongst that class
of society. "The Assembly has always been against communicating to them the dark and dangerous
fanaticism of the Methodists, which, grafted on the African superstitions, and
the general temperament of Negroes in a state of bondage, has produced, and
must continue to produce, the most fatal consequences, equally inimical to their
well being and comfort in this world, and to the practice of those virtues which
we are led to believe ensure happiness in the next. "But the representatives of the people have not displayed any of that aversion
with which they have been charged, to encourage the propagation of Christianity
in the form which they thought likely to be beneficial. . . . "It shows further, however, that the representatives of the people have always
been desirous to encourage the introduction of pastors, whose education gave
security for the nature of the doctrines which they were to inculcate. "They continue of that disposition, although equally satisfied, as in former
times, that to communicate the lights of Christianity through Methodism would
have consequences the most fatal to the temporal comforts of the slaves, and
the safety of the community." This Report was accepted unanimously, and on December 22, 1815, a resolution
passed, also unanimously, to this effect: "That early in the next session, this
house will take into consideration the state of religion amongst the slaves,
and carefully investigate the [44. Note:--Cfr. Further Proceedings of the Honourable House of Assembly
of Jamaica, relative to a Bill introduced into the House of Commons for effectually
preventing the unlawful importation of slaves and holding free persons in slavery
in the British Colonies, London, 1816, p. 40f.] {p. 234} means of diffusing the light of genuine Christianity, divested of the dark
and dangerous fanaticism of the Methodists, which has been attempted to be propagated,
and which, grafted on the African superstitions, and working on the uninstructed
minds and ardent temperament of the Negroes, has produced the most pernicious
consequences to individuals, and is pregnant with imminent danger to the community."[45] As already noted, neither side of the controversy even suspected the real root
difficulty. The Methodist Missionaries felt that they were the victims of the
rankest bigotry and cried aloud in protest. If they had only realized that they
were offering themselves as martyrs to revivify and extend absolute Paganism
with a veneer of Christianity in the resuscitated Myalism that was parading
as Revivalism, they might have been less outspoken in their denunciation of
the entire House of Assembly. If the planters, on the other hand, who honestly
recognized in the unrest, caused by the activities of the Methodists, among
the slaves, the significant forerunners of serious disorders, if they had only
been able to really analyze the situation, and distinguish between the strong
Myalistic tendencies and the Methodistic emotional susceptibilities, they might
have been able to direct the latter influence into less dangerous channels and
have opened the eyes of its proponents to what was actually afoot. But each
side of the controversy was deaf to the arguments of the other, just as they
were both blind to the real nature of the terrific forces for harm that were
accumulating among the mass of the blacks. When the dreaded uprising actually began in St. James Parish on the night of
December 28, 1831, the feeling of bitterness on both sides was intense. The
Reverend David Jonathan East, writing on the West Indies in the Centenary
Volume of the Baptist Missionary Society,[46] admits that the insurrection
"broke out in the very district in which missionary labours had been most successful,"
and adds at once: "It is not perhaps surprising that the [45. Ditto, p. 42. 46. London, 1892, p. 191.] {p. 235} first thought of the planters was that missionaries were the authors of the
rebellion." Exaggerated as this view of the planters certainly was, it is no more extreme
than the attitude of some of the missionaries themselves. Thus the Reverend
Peter Duncan, who was a Methodist Minister in Jamaica at the very time of the
slave-rebellion, fosters his own resentment, and writing eighteen years after
the events, unhesitatingly insinuates, seemingly with absolutely no foundation
in fact: "Time may yet show, whether, in some instances, the negroes were not
directly instigated to violence for the purpose of casting odium upon the missionaries."[47]
And in a note he explains: "This thought has been ridiculed, and it has been
asked, whether it can be believed, that any man would instigate the negroes
to destroy his own property: Perhaps not; but it never was pretended that the
instigators of the negroes had property to destroy. The overseers, the parties
alluded to, had no property. Such found it easier to kindle the fire than to
put it out. It is not, however, suspected that many directly instigated the
negroes to the work of destruction. "[48] If both sides could only have understood the insidious workings of Myalism
as we do today, how much different might have been the closing days of slavery
in Jamaica. In place of the mutual antagonism, and bitter recriminations, they
might have worked harmoniously together for the peace and prosperity of the
entire community." The years of apprenticeship might then have witnessed [47. Duncan, Wesleyan Mission to Jamaica, p. 223. 48. Ditto, p. 273, Note 1. 49. Note:--We might then have been spared this terrible arraignment: "The misdirected
efforts and misguided counsel of certain Ministers of Religion, sadly so miscalled,
if the Saviour's example and teaching is to be the standard, have led to their
natural, their necessary, their inevitable result (amongst an ignorant, excitable,
and uncivilized population)--rebellion, arson, murder. These are hard and harsh
words, gentlemen, but they are true; and this is no time to indulge in selected
sentences, or polished phraseology."--Speech of His Excellency, Edward John
Eyre, Governor of Jamaica, before the Legislative Council, Tuesday, November
7, 1865, at the opening of the first session after the Morant Bay Rebellion.--Cfr.
Augustus Constantine Sinclair, Parliamentary Debates of Jamaica, Spanish-Town,
1866, Vol. XIII, p. 3. And the Assembly in their answering Address to the Governor,
on the following day, state: "We desire to express our entire concurrence in
Your Excellency's statement that, {footnote p. 236} to the misapprehensions
and misrepresentations of pseudo philanthropists in England and in this country.
. . . and to the misdirected efforts and misguided zeal of certain miscalled
ministers of religion, is to be attributed the present disorganization of the
colony, resulting in rebellion, arson, and murder."--Cfr. l. c., p. 13.] {p. 236} a gradual enlightenment of the masses of former slaves, spiritually as well
as intellectually. And with their freedom from bondage, they might naturally
have acquired a disillusionment as regards Myalism and Obeah alike, In that
case the recrudescence of Paganism that blighted the early days of reconstruction
might never have occurred. In any case, the fact remains that actually the forces of Myalism and Obeah
today have degenerated into a common form of witchcraft not unfrequently associated
with devil worship, and even those of the blacks who belittle its general influence,
in practice show a wholesome fear of the powers of the Obeah man. And here we
must leave the question for the present, reserving for a future volume a detailed
study of Duppyism and kindred subjects. {p. 237}